EU casino licences.Match the business to the market.

Choose the market before opening a register

Start with the service being assessed: a particular website providing a particular gambling activity to a particular market. “European” describes too little to identify the required authorisation. A company can have an overseas address while its website operates under rules for another market.

EU member states retain different gambling frameworks. The European Commission explains that authorisations are not subject to automatic mutual recognition. An Italian ADM concession identifies an Italian permission; a Maltese company address or an MGA licence does not establish permission in every other country.

Europe and the European Union are different geographical terms. This English-language publication serves readers across Europe, including non-EU markets. Use the authority responsible for the place and activity concerned; a country label alone is not an account-access conclusion.

Build a licence record that another reader can repeat

1. Capture the claim.

   Record the website address, operator named in the terms, claimed authority and licence or concession number. Use the account contract when a corporate page names several companies.

2. Search independently.

   Open the relevant authority’s official register independently. Use the legal company, trading name, domain and licence number where those search fields are provided. Registers use different formats and languages; a failed brand-name search is a reason to investigate further, not proof of a particular licence status.

3. Read status and activity.

   Establish whether the record is active and covers the relevant service. A pending or suspended record is not the same finding as an active one. A company’s presence alone does not answer which activities it can provide.

4. Save the match and its limits.

   Put the register URL and check date beside the exact domain. If an identifier fails to match, write that explicitly. Avoid a generic “licensed” label that hides the market.

Record the date and scope of the result. If the register, casino footer and account contract disagree, keep the inconsistency visible and seek clarification from the relevant source. Do not resolve it by assuming that similar company names or related domains are interchangeable.

Read the five Italian records as a worked example

Our source research matched these five domains to ADM records on 8 September 2026. The table preserves that dated Italian finding. It is not a live register feed or a list of permissions for every European market.

Notice the different evidence fields: StarVegas is the brand; Greentube Malta Limited is the recorded legal operator; 16038 identifies the Italian concession in this research. None of those fields can be substituted for the exact domain.

When a website instead claims a Maltese licence, use the MGA’s own licensee register to investigate that claim. Do not use “Malta” in a company name as a shortcut to an MGA conclusion.

Keep permission, eligibility and account protections separate

A strong finding in one row does not fill a blank in another. A matched Italian concession cannot establish account eligibility in Spain or Sweden, for example. Likewise, a published withdrawal estimate does not establish the time a real withdrawal took. Each conclusion needs evidence for its own scope.

Licensing also cannot remove the financial risk of gambling. Personal limits and access to help remain relevant even after the business and authorisation have been established.

Handle an absent or conflicting record without overclaiming

If a brand search returns no result, repeat the search with the exact domain and legal operator. Check spelling, country edition and whether you followed the regulator’s own site. A failed first search is not enough to declare that a business has no licence.

If the exact domain still cannot be reconciled with the claim, stop at “authorisation not established”. Save the conflicting sources and request an explanation. Do not submit identity documents or a deposit to find out whether the uncertainty matters.

A copied certificate image, a badge linked to an unrelated record, or an old number beside a new company name are reasons to investigate. They do not tell you, without further evidence, whether the cause is stale publishing, a business change or a more serious problem.

For an existing dispute, preserve the terms that applied, transaction details and correspondence, then follow the complaint process for that account. Do not assume that another country’s regulator can resolve it.

How European Casino labels its conclusions

Our five reviews are public-source research. An ADM mapping is recorded as an Italian finding, with the operator and exact domain visible. Access outside Italy remains unverified; StarCasino has an explicit Italy-only registration finding. No gambling account was opened to test registration, withdrawals or customer support.

A review updated on 9 September does not automatically turn an 8 September source check into a new register search. We retain the research date so readers can distinguish an editorial change from fresh evidence. Follow the original links when you need the current position.

The same approach applies to protections. National and operator self-exclusion systems can have different coverage. An exclusion in one system must not be assumed to transfer automatically to every European website. If you are already self-excluded, another country or casino is not a route around that decision.

Common questions